Quantcast
Channel: Black Entertainment, Money, Style and Beauty Blogs - Black Voices
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4256

Forest Whitaker to Star in Film Funded By Qaddafi Family

$
0
0

Filed under:

The belief that it is hard to get films funded that feature black stars is not new. In a recent example, we are now very familiar with the story behind the award-winning movie 'Precious,' which took years to get financed. When it finally was, it was by a white family who wagered their personal fortune on the black film -- not by Hollywood. Given this reality, how far should some producers be willing to go to get films made featuring black stars who are not appreciated by Hollywood? Would it be fair for producers who want to use African American talent to even accept money from former terrorists?

The list of black stars who can get a mainstream film made is way too short, including only Denzel Washington, Halle Berry and Will Smith. This leaves an amazing stable of talented African American actors in limbo between periods of short-lived success. One of these venerable and underutilized talents is the great Forest Whitaker.


Despite winning a 2007 Best Actor Academy Award and a place in the public's heart, Whitaker is still not powerful enough in the Hollywood establishment to remain consistently working. In fact, in recent months BlackVoices.com did a report that questioned whether Forest Whitaker was being railroaded by the traditional Hollywood system, which shuttled his film 'Hurricane Season' directly to DVD with no promotion in 2010. In 2008, Whitaker revealed that he had been called "ugly, black and unbankable" by a Hollywood executive. Cruel words that underscore the hard reality of funding black actors in mainstream films.

Enter the Qaddafi family. The nation of Libya is now attempting to shake off its association with terrorism, and wide-ranging investment is one of its top PR tools. Countries around the world are reopening the doors of trade with the nation, as the U.S. and U.N. are lifting their economic sanctions against it. In control of a nation rich in oil and other resources, Libya's ruling Qaddafi family has access to hoards of cash that as dictators they can spend freely. And one of their entrepreneurial sons is seeking to spread the wealth in the form of film financing. The Daily Beast reports that Saadi Qaddafi, son of the infamous Muammar, does not shy away from movies with black stars -- unlike many American producers:

Libya essentially took responsibility for the Lockerbie bombing in 2008, when it set up a compensation fund for U.S. victims. That same year the U.S. appointed its first ambassador to the country in nearly 40 years.

Said to have the largest oil reserves in Africa, Libya has, perhaps not surprisingly, attracted the interest of oil companies such as BP, Shell, and ExxonMobil.

And in the same way that the U.S. has been drawn to Libya for its most wanted export, Libya now wants a piece of America's most undeniable commodity: Hollywood movies.

So far, Qaddafi has backed three projects, among them 'Isolation,' a thriller about a medical student who wakes up in a hospital isolation room to find out she's been exposed to an unknown disease. And while neither Saadi, or his infamous father or brother, ever visited the set, the family was still a presence-an empty director's chair bore their name...

In addition to 'Isolation,' currently in post-production, the Qaddafi-backed company [Natural Selection, LLC] has helped finance
'The Experiment,' starring Adrien Brody and Forrest Whitaker.

Responses to the Qaddafi family financing films has ranged from outrage against the "ethical, moral, and political" implications of working with a name associated with killing innocents, to what seems to be a pretty standard filmmaking mantra: "We don't turn down money in Hollywood" (The Daily Beast). While of course it is easy to understand the rush to condemn movie producers who take money from any Qaddafi, Saadi or Muammar, at the same time we have to consider just how hard it is to get a film with a black star financed.


Related:
+Forest Whitaker: Is Black Oscar Winner Being Railroaded By Studio?
+Forest Whitaker's 'Hurricane Season' Finally Released on DVD


When the likes of even Forest Whitaker is deemed "ugly, black and unbankable," it makes sense for producers wanting to work with such a gem to do a deal with the devil in order to bring his abilities to light. In addition, we can't call out the filmmakers willing to do business with the son without shining a light on the nations willing to broker deals with the father. Apparently, "Libyan exports to the U.S. have grown six-fold, reaching nearly $2 billion in 2009, and Libya now imports over $700 million worth of goods and services from the United States, up from about $40 million in 2004, according to the International Monetary Fund" (The Daily Beast).

This commerce with the elder Qaddafi comes courtesy of our same great nation that can't find the funding to get a black film made in the traditional system -- unless it stars Halle Berry.

While it is irksome to think that the Qaddafis have anything to do with enabling black actors to express themselves in empowering roles, at least this use of their funds addresses the social ill of the lack of quality films starring black actors. If people really have a problem with western nations associating with the Qaddafi Family, it would make more sense to address their grievances to the U.S. and U.K., among other world powers, which are profiting handsomely from a renewed relationship with Libya.

Hopefully Forest Whitaker will not be scapegoated in his association with the Qaddafi family. But given the history of successful black people being made into scapegoats in many situations throughout history, this is a high probability.

What do you think? Is Forest Whitaker taking Qaddafi money wrong? Or is it right to get a black star working "by any means necessary"?

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4256

Trending Articles