![Obama's Tax Cuts]()
UPDATE: House Democrats Reject Obama Tax Cut Deal In Non-Binding Vote, Demand Changes
There's really no point in continuing to pile on to the criticism of President Obama's tax-cut compromise with the GOP. That's been discussed ad nauseum, and me adding further quips would just be demeaning, cruel and unnecessary. However, I must say that given the President's awesome negotiation skills, I'd sure love to buy a new car from him.
Zing!
While the "rich get even richer" nature of the compromise has been well documented, one obscure provision that adds insult to injury to those at the other end of the economic spectrum has been largely overlooked. That's right, some poor folks are actually going to end up owing more in taxes:
The deal to extend the Bush-era tax cuts for two years includes a bevy of additional credits and deductions that will reduce the burden on nearly all households. But the tax benefits will flow most heavily to the highest earners, just as the original cuts did when they were passed in 2001 and 2003. At least a quarter of the tax savings will go to the wealthiest 1 percent of the population.
The tentative deal includes a two-year patch for the alternative minimum tax, a reduction in the payroll tax and a plan to reinstate the estate tax with lower rates and higher exemptions than in 2009 - all of which will offer far more savings for high earners than those in the low- or middle-income bracket. The wealthiest Americans will also reap tax savings from the proposal's plan to keep the cap on dividend and capital gains taxes at 15 percent, well below the highest rates on ordinary income.
That is good news for hedge fund managers and private equity investors, who appear to have withstood an effort to get them to pay more by eliminating a quirk in the tax code that allows most of their income to be taxed at just 15 percent.
In fact, the only groups likely to face a tax increase are those near the bottom of the income scale - individuals who make less than $20,000 and families with earnings below $40,000. The proposal does not include an extension of Mr. Obama's signature tax cut, the Making Work Pay credit, which provided a credit of up to $400 for individuals and $800 for families of low and moderate income.
Although the $120 billion payroll tax reduction offers nearly twice the tax savings of the credit it replaces, it will nonetheless lead to higher tax bills for individuals with incomes below $20,000 and families that make less than $40,000. That is because their payroll tax savings are less than the $400 or $800 they will lose from the Making Work Pay credit.
"It will come to a few dollars a week," said Roberton Williams, an analyst at the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, "but it is an increase."
http://xml.channel.aol.com/xmlpublisher/fetch.v2.xml?option=expand_relative_urls&dataUrlNodes=uiConfig,feedConfig,entry&id=962481&pid=962480&uts=1291931654
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/cs_feed_v1_6/csfeedwrapper.swf
Recent Obama Photos
President Obama greets members of the Congressional Black Caucus, including Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-NY, center, and Rep. Mel Watt, D-N.C., far left, after signing the Claims Resolution Act of 2010 which settles long-standing lawsuits by African American farmers and Native Americans against the federal government, in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, part of the White House complex, in Washington, Wednesday, Dec. 8, 2010. The act also authorizes $1.15 billion for black farmers who say they were discriminated against by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
AP
BlackVoices.com
Recent Obama Photos
President Barack Obama (R) shakes hands with Jim McNerney, President and CEO of the Boeing Company, at a meeting with the President's Export Council at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington, DC December 9, 2010.
Recent Obama Photos
President Obama greets members of the Congressional Black Caucus, including Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-NY, center, and Rep. Mel Watt, D-N.C., far left, after signing the Claims Resolution Act of 2010 which settles long-standing lawsuits by African American farmers and Native Americans against the federal government, in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, part of the White House complex, in Washington, Wednesday, Dec. 8, 2010. The act also authorizes $1.15 billion for black farmers who say they were discriminated against by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Recent Obama Photos
President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama watch as Susan Retik (2nd L) and her daughter Molly (L) light a Menorah on the second night of Hanukkah during a Hanukkah reception in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, December 2, 2010. The Menorah, loaned from Congregation Beth Israel in New Orleans, was discovered after Hurricane Katrina by cleanup crews covered in mold, filth and sewage. Retik's husband David was killed in the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Recent Obama Photos
President Barack Obama greets guests after signing the Claims Resolution Act of 2010 which settles long-standing lawsuits by African American farmers and Native Americans against the federal government, in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, part of the White House complex, in Washington, Wednesday, Dec. 8, 2010. The act also authorizes $1.15 billion for black farmers who say they were discriminated against by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Recent Obama Photos
President Barack Obama signs the Claims Resolution Act of 2010 along with administration officials, member of congress and congressional staff on December 8, 2010 in Washington, D.C. The bill will end a disputed Cobell v. Salazar Indian trust fund lawsuit against the federal government.
Recent Obama Photos
President Barack Obama speaks at tje signing the Claims Resolution Act of 2010 which settles long-standing lawsuits by African American farmers and Native Americans against the federal government, in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, part of the White House complex, in Washington, Wednesday, Dec. 8, 2010. The act also authorizes $1.15 billion for black farmers who say they were discriminated against by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Recent Obama Photos
First lady Michelle Obama greets people after speaking at a ceremony to dedicate the first of three new Fisher houses,Thursday, Dec. 2, 2010, at the Bethesda Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Md. The new houses joins a network of other Fisher Houses serving the families of military personal who are recovering at the hospital.
Recent Obama Photos
President Barack Obama greets business leaders in the Executive Office Building, on the White House campus in Washington, Thursday, Dec. 9, 2010, as he holds a meeting with the President's Export Council.
Recent Obama Photos
President Barack Obama meets with Polish President Bronislaw Komorowski (L) during meetings in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, December 8, 2010. Komorowski met with Obama amid a brewing storm over the diplomatic cables published by Wikileaks, which Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said have eroded the trust between Warsaw and Washington.
Recent Obama Photos
President Barack Obama shakes hands with Polish President Bronislaw Komorowski (L) during meetings in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, December 8, 2010. Komorowski met with Obama amid a brewing storm over the diplomatic cables published by Wikileaks, which Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said have eroded the trust between Warsaw and Washington.
Recent Obama Photos
Wow. Just. Wow.
Folks -- what more can I say about how raw a deal this was? I simply can't see anything good that came of these negotiations. Obama added to the deficit. He caved in to the right. He walked back on a campaign promise. This is a textbook lose-lose.
This won't help the jobs forecast, because tax cuts for the rich have repeatedly proven to have no tangible economic impact for the good. He could have just as easily separated the unemployment benefits issue from the tax cuts and forced the GOP to cave in. They've only done this whole "posturing about the deficit, then voting for unemployment benefits anyway" thing about, oh, three-four times already this year. Why allow them to highjack one issue (unemployment) by attaching an unrelated one (tax cuts for the rich), when neither solves what's presumably the biggest issue (jobs! jobs! jobs!) facing the economy?
Sure, this tax hike for the poor is relatively minor, but it's merely a reflection of the bigger issue.
The rich will get richer. And the poor will get poorer. On President Obama's command. Not a good look.
Jay Anderson is a freelance writer from Washington, DC, whose work has been featured in the Washington Post and on NPR. When he's not busy talking smack here, he runs the award-winning blog
AverageBro.com. Follow him via Twitter @AverageBro.
Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments
