Debrahlee Lorenzana claims that she was fired from Citigroup earlier this year for being too hot to be a banker. She took the media by storm with her allegations, appearing on television shows and in photo spreads displaying the beauty that allegedly prevented her from making bank at the bank. She is currently suing Citigroup for firing her for her amazing looks, while the bank claims she was let go for poor performance. But perhaps Debrahlee Lorenzana's claims are part of a trend in discrimination by Citigroup against female employees.
Six more women are now stepping forward in a new law suit against Citigroup claiming that unfair treatment at the bank was motivated by their gender. The Daily Mail reports:
Bosses at one of America's biggest banks have been accused of sacking female staff to save the jobs of less-qualified men.
A group of women working for banking giant Citigroup have filed a class action lawsuit claiming the bank is effectively run as a 'boy's club'.
The five former employees and one current employee claimed less qualified men kept their jobs during a mass round of redundancies while they were fired or demoted.
The lawsuit alleges the bank used the economic downturn and financial meltdown, which saw banks shed thousands of jobs, to purge its workforce of female employees while retaining less qualified men.
They also claim that women working at the bank have a 'glass ceiling', are paid less than their male counterparts and sexist comments are rife.
One example given in paperwork filed in the District Court in Manhattan said a female employee faced 'inappropriate and offensive' comments based on her gender.
It said when she returned from maternity leave, she was demoted.
Citigroup was at the centre of sex discrimination claim earlier this year when Debrahleee Lorenzana claimed she was fired for being 'too sexy'.
Read the rest at The Daily Mail.
While I applaud these women for stepping up and sticking up for their rights, this is hardly a scenario that is only taking place at Citigroup. In every workplace in America, especially as women move closer to the top of the corporate hierarchy in powerful companies, these are common experiences. If they are suing Citigroup for these accusations, almost all women should file a class action law suit against America.
U.S. News & World Report notes that there are several professional occupations in which men earn a full 25% more than women according to recent U.S. Labor Department data. And while recent reports show that in urban areas, a childless, unmarried professional woman earns more than her male counterpart, the same stats prove that a comparable woman with kids still earns much less than a man. Women on average in America lag behind men a full 23 percentage points in earnings, and "women [only] occupy 15% of board seats and are 3% of CEOs" (USA Today). So these brave women of Citigroup are hardly alone in their battle against sexism in the workplace. They might just be the pioneers who are starting to take action and do something about it.
Some authors blame these findings on women for being less flexible than men when it comes to child-rearing. For example, Liz Wolgemuth writes that it is women who choose to leave the corporate environment before they have a chance to advance, and that as they have children they become less available for demanding tasks like long-term travel. Wolgemuth notes that a woman who does not marry and remains childless can actually earn more than a male executive, as can a woman who works like a man but has a male spouse who stays at home. But observations such as these miss the main point that this is still gender discrimination.
It is not fair to women to expect them to give up motherhood in exchange for full parity in the workplace. This assumes that all women will be able to find stay-at-home partners, which seems unlikely -- or worse that a woman must forgo reproduction in order to get ahead. The fact that society does not require this of a man is gender bias at its worst.
Childbearing and rearing are important social roles that deserve respect. Women have much to contribute to society as both mothers and productive people in the workforce. To continue to penalize women for wanting to both be mothers and workers by not rewarding them with the money and promotions they are due in 2010 is criminally insane. Not only is it unfair to female employees, it also prevents U.S. companies from getting the benefit of the best brain power possible, which is necessary for making our companies the most profitable. As women leave environments that do not reward them and penalize motherhood, it is inevitable that corporations become male-dominated spaces where woman fail to excel. And where Debrahlee Lorenzana cannot wear pencil skirts!
Related:
+Oprah Being Sued for Plagiarism: Booklet Author Seeking $150K
+Juan Williams Incident Proves That Freedom of Speech is Dead in the Workplace
Other countries have laws for mandated maternity leave, paternity leave and even percentages of government positions that must be held by women in order to ensure that gender discrimination is kept in check. It's time that the United States followed suit. If companies and the government do not work with women, there are going to be a lot more expensive law suits from people like Debrahlee Lorenzana, which will reduce the overall productivity of our economy. In the end, nobody will win. It's hard to imagine why anyone would want to perpetuate these holdover attitudes of sexism from a bygone era when women were 100% dependent on men and had to stay at home.
Now that families need at least two incomes in order to survive, hardworking wives and mothers like Debrahlee Lorenzana are not willing to take gender discrimination anymore. Debrahlee Lorenzana's law suit and this latest suit against Citigroup by six new women show that the time of corporate America as a Boy's Club is over.
Six more women are now stepping forward in a new law suit against Citigroup claiming that unfair treatment at the bank was motivated by their gender. The Daily Mail reports:
Bosses at one of America's biggest banks have been accused of sacking female staff to save the jobs of less-qualified men.
A group of women working for banking giant Citigroup have filed a class action lawsuit claiming the bank is effectively run as a 'boy's club'.
The five former employees and one current employee claimed less qualified men kept their jobs during a mass round of redundancies while they were fired or demoted.
The lawsuit alleges the bank used the economic downturn and financial meltdown, which saw banks shed thousands of jobs, to purge its workforce of female employees while retaining less qualified men.
They also claim that women working at the bank have a 'glass ceiling', are paid less than their male counterparts and sexist comments are rife.
One example given in paperwork filed in the District Court in Manhattan said a female employee faced 'inappropriate and offensive' comments based on her gender.
It said when she returned from maternity leave, she was demoted.
Citigroup was at the centre of sex discrimination claim earlier this year when Debrahleee Lorenzana claimed she was fired for being 'too sexy'.
Read the rest at The Daily Mail.
While I applaud these women for stepping up and sticking up for their rights, this is hardly a scenario that is only taking place at Citigroup. In every workplace in America, especially as women move closer to the top of the corporate hierarchy in powerful companies, these are common experiences. If they are suing Citigroup for these accusations, almost all women should file a class action law suit against America.
U.S. News & World Report notes that there are several professional occupations in which men earn a full 25% more than women according to recent U.S. Labor Department data. And while recent reports show that in urban areas, a childless, unmarried professional woman earns more than her male counterpart, the same stats prove that a comparable woman with kids still earns much less than a man. Women on average in America lag behind men a full 23 percentage points in earnings, and "women [only] occupy 15% of board seats and are 3% of CEOs" (USA Today). So these brave women of Citigroup are hardly alone in their battle against sexism in the workplace. They might just be the pioneers who are starting to take action and do something about it.
Some authors blame these findings on women for being less flexible than men when it comes to child-rearing. For example, Liz Wolgemuth writes that it is women who choose to leave the corporate environment before they have a chance to advance, and that as they have children they become less available for demanding tasks like long-term travel. Wolgemuth notes that a woman who does not marry and remains childless can actually earn more than a male executive, as can a woman who works like a man but has a male spouse who stays at home. But observations such as these miss the main point that this is still gender discrimination.
It is not fair to women to expect them to give up motherhood in exchange for full parity in the workplace. This assumes that all women will be able to find stay-at-home partners, which seems unlikely -- or worse that a woman must forgo reproduction in order to get ahead. The fact that society does not require this of a man is gender bias at its worst.
Childbearing and rearing are important social roles that deserve respect. Women have much to contribute to society as both mothers and productive people in the workforce. To continue to penalize women for wanting to both be mothers and workers by not rewarding them with the money and promotions they are due in 2010 is criminally insane. Not only is it unfair to female employees, it also prevents U.S. companies from getting the benefit of the best brain power possible, which is necessary for making our companies the most profitable. As women leave environments that do not reward them and penalize motherhood, it is inevitable that corporations become male-dominated spaces where woman fail to excel. And where Debrahlee Lorenzana cannot wear pencil skirts!
Related:
+Oprah Being Sued for Plagiarism: Booklet Author Seeking $150K
+Juan Williams Incident Proves That Freedom of Speech is Dead in the Workplace
Other countries have laws for mandated maternity leave, paternity leave and even percentages of government positions that must be held by women in order to ensure that gender discrimination is kept in check. It's time that the United States followed suit. If companies and the government do not work with women, there are going to be a lot more expensive law suits from people like Debrahlee Lorenzana, which will reduce the overall productivity of our economy. In the end, nobody will win. It's hard to imagine why anyone would want to perpetuate these holdover attitudes of sexism from a bygone era when women were 100% dependent on men and had to stay at home.
Now that families need at least two incomes in order to survive, hardworking wives and mothers like Debrahlee Lorenzana are not willing to take gender discrimination anymore. Debrahlee Lorenzana's law suit and this latest suit against Citigroup by six new women show that the time of corporate America as a Boy's Club is over.